Post by Morten St. George Post by firstname.lastname@example.org
Your arrogance beggars belief. Sad to say there are still a growing number of your kind. The cause being an education system that encourages wide speculation and question good old common sense.
I think you got it all wrong. The real culprit here is the global media that scorns everyone who challenges the official storyline, whether that be Lee Harvey Oswald on the JFK assassination, Osama bin Laden on the 9/11 attacks, or Shakspere of Stratford on Shakespearean authorship. Simply put, without knowing it, you people have been brainwashed.
It's not the media. In the USA the people who thought Kennedy was great, we now know he was far from perfect, couldn't believe that a man of no consequence whatsoever could have killed him, despite all the facts. The 9/11 attacks are simply young people who like have said before, went via education, the "education culture" to question even the higher people in their own religion, who were applaud at such behaviour and find a loop hole that the UK had in place for years. Not having metal detectors on airport security.
The fact that you are unaware of the side effects of sending kids to school says a lot about the education system. For where are you going to find a University person to say that having Education in the way it currently stands will encourage extremes of behaviour? Wouldn't politicians around the world CUTT spending on education if that was the case?
I'll give you some more of the side effects so you know how widespread the problem is.
"First various religions do not know if they are coming or going, literally! Divorce figures have shot through the roof, crime has soared, a sex revolution. Single parents are now common; estates have more kids than adults, despite the pill. We have more teenage pregnancies. Marriage is most likely in decline. Abuse cases have increased, violence in relationships increased. Drink and drugs abuse, together with the dealing of drugs. Violent crime has increased, along with sexual crime, rape, of even elderly women. The breakdown of the family unit is all too common, together with massive levels of homeless and another class, the under class developed, in a supposedly class less society. We have poverty in a welfare state system that was to stop mass unemployment. Also we see politeness very much in decline, rudeness very much on the up. Racism and racial intolerance increases. Apathy over crime and the hard won vote, with people that don’t seem to care about others and feelings of being powerless. Women now work more than men do. Vandalism, litter and graffiti are everywhere. Farmers are leaving the Countryside and city dwellers are living in their homes, while decline of most cities sets in, despite attempts to control it. Others have the feeling to escape the modern society or to blow parts of it up.
On the other hand gains have been made such as: massive technological advance, urban sprawl, wealth, sexual liberation for women and children freed from working till at least 16, more broadminded people who tolerate and protect those who are different and many more."
The following also shows how we blame other things for changes we don't like. But in essence they are in contradiction of the way our bodies were set up. many thousands of years ago.
"We therefore can’t tell even for certain what the culture of hunter/gatherers was. However the human body behaves in ways that only fit certain patterns of a lifestyle. Most of us wouldn’t want and don’t want to change back to that existence, which undoubtedly still controls our bodies. Some now see hunting as barbaric, even for food. Opting out of eating flesh of another creature altogether. Yet we pay and have paid an enormous cost for changing our daily life away from it. We try and use technology to solve most of the problems we are experiencing. So far we haven’t got a clue as to why some of the problems, despite: wealth, better food and newer technologies are still with us. Even in the wealthiest countries problems have got worse. Old people recall that it wasn’t like that when they were young. Each newer generation of elderly repeat this. It’s so rapid that even much younger people are now saying it. Still it’s put down to rapid technological change and the society it creates. Who thought that one up? Having a mobile phone doesn’t cause people to neglect their children. If you look into any products origins, it seems a lot of this technology seems to be in response to this change rather than driving it. Take television. If you put the box into a culture that’s not seen one before it changes the daily life of these people. But you could say that about any invention. It doesn’t have to an invention! Go back to the Wild West of America, the Indian on his horse. A common image, but the Europeans gave them horses, which changed the American Indian’s existence. American horses are just as much immigrants along with the white man who killed and gave the native population diseases. Anyway back to television, those who wanted to set up the service saw it as an educational tool. Society wanted something different and got rid of those who set it up; replacing it with those who wanted it different. Now they are under threat, from those who want something else. Presumably the process will repeat, rather like the TV programmes. What then does drive this change - greed? We see things and we want them? A thing that TV is said to promote. If that were the case, we would be all stealing from one another by now! The Victorians were greedier than modern people in Britain. They let young children work down pits so they could make massive profits. Just look at the Empire they built, they didn‘t care if it destroyed old cultures. Only how much richer it made them, a monument to plain greediness. Their 15-year-old children did not behave in the same way as 21st Century kids. You might find isolated examples, as in we are all human. But when the vast majority have those isolated behavioural pockets, it tells you things have changed. So much so, the Conservative Party (in the UK) tried to reintroduce Victorian Values to eighties Britain, did they succeed? We all know they didn’t. Also few Conservatives would agree they had, never mind everyone else. But Britain hasn’t been alone in wanting to bring back ‘traditional’ ways. Most modern countries have got this hankering back to the past attitude to many things."
Post by Morten St. George
So, you claim that Shakspere was simultaneously an actor and the leading playwright for a playing company called the Lord Chamberlaine’s Men.
Not at first. He was the leading person in the Queen's men. Most of the people in that were part of later groups of actors. The Queen's men was shut down around 1588. All the Shakespeare plays, some 600 of them, date to around 1580 and 1588.
Their patron was Henry Carey, then George Carey. Is their any historical record that Shakspere ever met either of them?
You are following the Stratfordian line, which is odd because you normally don't follow a lines on your own enquires. You in fact go off on unsupported theories.
Post by Morten St. George
And what about Elizabeth I? Didn’t she enjoy the Shakespearean plays? Wouldn’t she want to meet the brilliant playwright? But there is no historical record of any such contact there either, and, yes, the court scribes did keep records of her doings.
There are historical records. There's the picture with Queen Elizabeth and Dudley dancing. To the far left of the picture is the young William Shakespeare. He's playing a drum. Marlowe is next with a fiddle type instrument, you can also make out other actors in the band. You had to be very versatile as court entertainers. And Elizabeth of course writes the Sonnets with him. Of course this is all much against Stratfordian thinking. In 1588 the Queen's men comes to an end. Why?
As I have said before Marlowe tells her that he has been sleeping with Shakespeare's wife Anne. The Queen didn't know William was married and throws them all out ending the Queen's men. To protect her reputation she censors the court records, to remove William Shakespeare from them. Shakespeare also wishes to protect her reputation too. So he hides himself away. Though at first he tries to get her to change his mind by doing the Venus and Adonis publication, giving the upper class twit, Southampton a £1000 for the dedication and to talk to her. It succeeds and the Lord Chamberlain lot enters the scene and the Official records start appearing. But they are ALL old plays just remastered. When Ben Jonson publishers the Sonnets, Shakespeare destroys any clues to who he was and hides away to protect the Queen's reputation. Even though at this point she's dead.
Post by Morten St. George
In 1603, King James became patron of that playing company and the name was changed to the King’s Men. Like Elizabeth, James too enjoyed the Shakespearean plays, but once again there is no historical record that he ever met or desired to meet the great playwright of his playing company.
As for King James he has a perfect reason to hide William Shakespeare, though he does crop up in the records. As Shakespeare fathered all of King James kids. That's why the Royal Family even today look like William Shakespeare and anyone who has any kind of descent from the Royal Family, which probably includes myself, as I look like William Shakespeare.
Post by Morten St. George
The truth of the matter is
You need to face reality.
Reality is subjective to what you brain makes it out.
For example you see the world not as it should be. For your eyes would be out of focus surrounded by garbage, shifting rapidly from side to side, upside down, with weird colour patterns that would change depending where you were.
Your brain concentrates on one small section of what your eye sees, focus it. Turns it around, stops any movement and corrects the colour, it then from a inbuilt model tells you what you are seeing. It frequently makes mistakes. For example if you have alcohol tiny hairs inside your ear canals go stiff, and because you have a balance problem then, even though your eyes see that your head is upright, because the brain overrules your balance sensor, in favour of your eyes your vision goes spinning. There are also lots of vision tricks too. As can be seen in this video by Squeeze.
All based on the brain model being deceived.